Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate
Humans-Only Club for Discussion & Debate
A one-of-a-kind oasis of intelligent, in-depth, productive, civil debate.
Topics are uncensored, meaning even extremely controversial viewpoints can be presented and argued for, but our Forum Rules strictly require all posters to stay on-topic and never engage in ad hominems or personal attacks.
Chat about anything your heart desires here, just be civil. Factual or scientific questions about philosophy go here (e.g. "When was Socrates born?"), and so most homework help questions belong here. Note, posts in the off-topic section will not increase new members post counts. This includes the introductions and feedback sections.
We are all baffled from corona. But the virus itself has a high quota of survivors compared to ebola and hiv. But what if already persistent viruses could somehow mix with other viruses and form some kind of naturally bred binary biological weapon. How far is this possible? We all know that a perfect protection from deases is not possible, how far could this desaster scenario get ?
detail wrote: ↑April 20th, 2020, 1:14 pm
We are all baffled from corona. But the virus itself has a high quota of survivors compared to ebola and hiv. But what if already persistent viruses could somehow mix with other viruses and form some kind of naturally bred binary biological weapon. How far is this possible? We all know that a perfect protection from deases is not possible, how far could this desaster scenario get ?
Viruses don't need to "mix" with other viruses in order to change their genetics in following generations, since they mutate on their own and don't proliferate from sexual reproduction.