The source of Gravity and life: ✨ neutrinos?
Posted: July 22nd, 2023, 7:40 am
My other topic about JWST imagery addresses the questionable history of the Big Bang theory. In my opinion the story about Albert Einstein's involvement would be an example case for the theory of Thomas Kuhn and investigating it might lead to interesting insights.
The topic asserted that from a philosophical perspective it all comes down to the concept begin: an exploding primordial atom or ...?
The Big Bang theory is based on assumptions about Gravity that might be proven wrong using philosophical theory. The idea that Gravity can compress into an infinitely dense point (a primordial atom) might be disprovable.
Scientists in 2018: no one has ever truly understood Gravity, nor have they proven its existence. (Gravity is a Myth)
A good place for philosophical progress may be to investigate whether Gravity fundamentally requires quality. Scientists likely have been neglecting the slightest sight of that idea. The idea of Qualia/Quality belongs to values and philosophy and cannot be investigated by science.
There are some indications that Gravity emerges from neutrinos:
Gravity -- a neutrino effect?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Gravi ... ino-effect
Gravity Emerges...From Neutrinos?
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sc ... -neutrinos
If this were to be the case, neutrinos could be the source of both dark energy and Gravity with the same mechanism (a gravitational pull effect in different directions, which would include the source of life).
When it can be made evident that Gravity fundamentally requires quality, then there could be a case to seek the source within the potential of neutrinos to change their mass influence from within themselves, and that context might be beginning-less (infinite) of nature.
In theory neutrinos move at light speed because they can switch between so called 'mass flavours'. At light speed there is no time or distance so at question would be: how could a tiny particle deviate out of a state of timelessness to interact with mass in the physical world - 'out of itself'?
It seems common sense to me that life requires a fundamental topical energy source that is a priori to life's sensing of the world.
Subjective experience would not originate from within the matter of the organism but externally, from a context that cannot be a pattern, e.g. a context Other than what existed but not irrelevant. One might consider that context beginning-less of nature, since it is the origin of the 'begin' by which subjectivity is manifested.
Questions:
The topic asserted that from a philosophical perspective it all comes down to the concept begin: an exploding primordial atom or ...?
The Big Bang theory is based on assumptions about Gravity that might be proven wrong using philosophical theory. The idea that Gravity can compress into an infinitely dense point (a primordial atom) might be disprovable.
Scientists in 2018: no one has ever truly understood Gravity, nor have they proven its existence. (Gravity is a Myth)
A good place for philosophical progress may be to investigate whether Gravity fundamentally requires quality. Scientists likely have been neglecting the slightest sight of that idea. The idea of Qualia/Quality belongs to values and philosophy and cannot be investigated by science.
There are some indications that Gravity emerges from neutrinos:
Gravity -- a neutrino effect?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Gravi ... ino-effect
Gravity Emerges...From Neutrinos?
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sc ... -neutrinos
If this were to be the case, neutrinos could be the source of both dark energy and Gravity with the same mechanism (a gravitational pull effect in different directions, which would include the source of life).
When it can be made evident that Gravity fundamentally requires quality, then there could be a case to seek the source within the potential of neutrinos to change their mass influence from within themselves, and that context might be beginning-less (infinite) of nature.
In theory neutrinos move at light speed because they can switch between so called 'mass flavours'. At light speed there is no time or distance so at question would be: how could a tiny particle deviate out of a state of timelessness to interact with mass in the physical world - 'out of itself'?
When a neutrino changes "flavor" or "color" it is in a transition state and therefore can be any mass. At the midpoint it is 0 mass and travels at speed c (light speed). When it becomes one or the other it has mass. In between it can have any mass, meaning even 0 mass. It's the same as Schrodingers cat. It works and is non-contradictory.When Gravity is caused by the potential of neutrinos to deviate out of a state of timelessness then it is that deviation potential that requires investigation and that might be an opportunity for philosophy to regain a leading position (a crossing point for science).
It seems common sense to me that life requires a fundamental topical energy source that is a priori to life's sensing of the world.
Subjective experience would not originate from within the matter of the organism but externally, from a context that cannot be a pattern, e.g. a context Other than what existed but not irrelevant. One might consider that context beginning-less of nature, since it is the origin of the 'begin' by which subjectivity is manifested.
Questions:
- What is your idea about Gravity?
- Is there a clue that Gravity fundamentally requires quality?
- Is there a link between Gravity, life and consciousness?