Braiding Sweetgrass
Posted: November 10th, 2021, 7:41 pm
"Braiding Sweetgrass" is a book by Environmental Biology Professor Robin Kimmerer. Kimmerer is an enrolled member of the Potowatami Nation, a Native American band that traditionally lived on the shores of Lake Michigan in Wisconsin. They were then "removed" -- first to Kansas, then to Oklahoma.
Kimmerer begins her book by recounting an origin story, common to many Native groups in the Great Lakes region.
According to Kimmerer (I've read only the first two chapters) the plants Skywoman brought with her can tell us their story, and our story. We have to learn to listen. The next chapter is about pecan trees, which were an important form os sustenance for the "removed" Potowatami. Pecans store energy (fat) in their roots, And when they have stored enough, they flower, giving forth a bounty of nuts. The cycle of the pecans affects the cycle of the other creatures in the system: the squirrel population skyrockets in years where there is a bounty of nuts; the hawk, fox, and coyote on increases as a result. Then there is bust. The pecans disappear for a couple of years. The squirrels haven't enough food, and there are a surplus of predators.
In addition, the pecan trees appear to communicate with each other. Theories about the method include giving off pheromones, and possibly through interconnected 'mycorrhizae, fungal strands that inhabit tree roots. The trees sometimes appear to act in concert, for the good of the group (I guess trees have more communal facility than Morton thinks humans have). Sometimes there are environmental triggers (warm Spring, lots of rain), but sometimes there are not. Kimmerer's point: the Potowatami say trees "talk" to one another, and now modern science appears to suggest they may. Traditional Western science (she thinks) is prejudiced in favor of thinking aobut "communication" only in animal terms. If pollen wafting on the wind can facillitate pland reproduction, isn't it possible that forms of communication can have similar bases?
I've just started the book -- but the heirarchical and antagonistic view of the Christian and Jewish origin story may have informed the way we see nature -- and Skywoman may inform the way the Potowatami see it. Also, I found the prejudices of Western Science bit interesting. Any thoughts?
Kimmerer begins her book by recounting an origin story, common to many Native groups in the Great Lakes region.
Skywoman fell like a maple seed, twirling in the breeze. In her hand she clutched a bundle of plants. A flock of geese saw her falling, and rose from the watery world, honking their song. They caught Skywoman, and bore her gently to the water. Around them gathered loons, and otters and beavers and ducks. A giant turtle swam up, and they lowered Skytwoman to its back. But there was no land on which she could make her home, only water. So the deep divers offered to dive to the bottom of the giant lake, and bring back some land. Otter tried and failed. Beaver tried and failed. The water was too deep. Finally, little muskrat swam to the bottom, and returned with a handful of mud. But he died as he gave the mud to Skywoman.This is the short version of the story. Kimmerer contrasts this story with that of Adam and Eve -- tempted by the snake, expelled from the Garden for eating its fruit, and "made in God's image". IN the Potowatami story, the animals, and even the plants are not only equals with humans, but sometimes their teachers -- for they have had time to figure things out, and to live in harmony with the world.
Skywoman spread the mud over the back of the turtle. Then she took the bundle she still carried in her hand, and carefully planted all the seeds in the mud. Wild grass, flowers, and trees grew, and now Skywoman and her animal friends had enough to eat on their home on Turtle Island.
According to Kimmerer (I've read only the first two chapters) the plants Skywoman brought with her can tell us their story, and our story. We have to learn to listen. The next chapter is about pecan trees, which were an important form os sustenance for the "removed" Potowatami. Pecans store energy (fat) in their roots, And when they have stored enough, they flower, giving forth a bounty of nuts. The cycle of the pecans affects the cycle of the other creatures in the system: the squirrel population skyrockets in years where there is a bounty of nuts; the hawk, fox, and coyote on increases as a result. Then there is bust. The pecans disappear for a couple of years. The squirrels haven't enough food, and there are a surplus of predators.
In addition, the pecan trees appear to communicate with each other. Theories about the method include giving off pheromones, and possibly through interconnected 'mycorrhizae, fungal strands that inhabit tree roots. The trees sometimes appear to act in concert, for the good of the group (I guess trees have more communal facility than Morton thinks humans have). Sometimes there are environmental triggers (warm Spring, lots of rain), but sometimes there are not. Kimmerer's point: the Potowatami say trees "talk" to one another, and now modern science appears to suggest they may. Traditional Western science (she thinks) is prejudiced in favor of thinking aobut "communication" only in animal terms. If pollen wafting on the wind can facillitate pland reproduction, isn't it possible that forms of communication can have similar bases?
I've just started the book -- but the heirarchical and antagonistic view of the Christian and Jewish origin story may have informed the way we see nature -- and Skywoman may inform the way the Potowatami see it. Also, I found the prejudices of Western Science bit interesting. Any thoughts?