Posted: June 25th, 2010, 11:28 am
Alun-You are wrong. Evolution (Darwinism and neo-Darwinism) emphatically states that all life started from a single organism which created, through a process of natural selection all life on earth, and that this process is "undirected" (random mutations and natural selection) and "random", occurring over a long, finite, amount of time. This amount of time is theorized to be about 4.5 billion years. This process also gives the "appearance" of "design". (But, is not).
If we consider that multiple coordination is necessary to effect beneficial functionality of a specific mutable organ in a complex biological organism, such as the evolution of the eye and the interpretive ability of the brain, or the oxygen carrying ability of a red blood cell from the lungs, or the ability of an organism to turn in the direction of the sun to attain UV benefits, and assess these processes against random mutability and natural selection then ask if that level of organizational coordination is possible considering that effects of a mutation are unknown and unpredictable and often deleterious without a directed mechanism assuring continued functionality throughout the process then we must ask if what we see is a complex organizational hierarchy of determined mutable functionality, or a random, unpredictable, possible hit or miss effects of theorized effective mutable functionality?
In order to create functional mutations which assure survival we need;
1. Organization
2. Coordination
3. Hierarchal imperatives
4. Continued (assured) functionality
5. Specificity??
6. Predictability??
Simply, for the Darwinian evolutionist (who wants it both ways) mutations occur out of necessity. This necessity is driven by the need for an organism to survive due to various changes, flux, to its environment, unpredicted forces which then drive the organism to create random, unpredictable and new information, which assist in, effective, functional, biologic change.
I continue to ask the question how, as a result of random mutation and natural selection, sex and gender distinctions, the appearance of male and female organisms, could have appeared naturally by the process of neo-Darwinian evolution, precisely due to hierarchal functionality. No one has yet attempted to explain to me how, or at what point, did the organism mutate into what amounts to two separate "species", male and female, without coordinated evolution resulting in effective, assured, mutual reproduction.
As Meleagar points out Alun you have not explained or demonstrated, you have simply asserted.
If we consider that multiple coordination is necessary to effect beneficial functionality of a specific mutable organ in a complex biological organism, such as the evolution of the eye and the interpretive ability of the brain, or the oxygen carrying ability of a red blood cell from the lungs, or the ability of an organism to turn in the direction of the sun to attain UV benefits, and assess these processes against random mutability and natural selection then ask if that level of organizational coordination is possible considering that effects of a mutation are unknown and unpredictable and often deleterious without a directed mechanism assuring continued functionality throughout the process then we must ask if what we see is a complex organizational hierarchy of determined mutable functionality, or a random, unpredictable, possible hit or miss effects of theorized effective mutable functionality?
In order to create functional mutations which assure survival we need;
1. Organization
2. Coordination
3. Hierarchal imperatives
4. Continued (assured) functionality
5. Specificity??
6. Predictability??
Simply, for the Darwinian evolutionist (who wants it both ways) mutations occur out of necessity. This necessity is driven by the need for an organism to survive due to various changes, flux, to its environment, unpredicted forces which then drive the organism to create random, unpredictable and new information, which assist in, effective, functional, biologic change.
I continue to ask the question how, as a result of random mutation and natural selection, sex and gender distinctions, the appearance of male and female organisms, could have appeared naturally by the process of neo-Darwinian evolution, precisely due to hierarchal functionality. No one has yet attempted to explain to me how, or at what point, did the organism mutate into what amounts to two separate "species", male and female, without coordinated evolution resulting in effective, assured, mutual reproduction.
As Meleagar points out Alun you have not explained or demonstrated, you have simply asserted.