Lagayscienza wrote: ↑August 30th, 2024, 10:12 am
I don't think we actually need to prove anything about lucid dreaming and hallucination. My advice is to just keep taking the tablets. And dream all you want about those hot actresses. Lucidly or otherwise. It's all fun, right?
Yes, but do you agree that dreams are not encryptions but are subjective or intersubjective interpretations.
Cathal seems to be claiming that someone or something puts an encrypted meaning into his mind:
The song below feels like a hidden remix of another high-pitch violin remix of Rihanna's song in such a way that I almost felt like a robot listening to the song! So it's easier to see how a remix of a remix can create a meta-perception for encryption when it comes to lucid dreaming.
It's widely recognised that one may actively participate in dreams or passively observe what is happening.
There is no reason to suggest that someone or something has encrypted some ulterior meaning.The Jungian idea of archetypes as applied to a dream deals in genuine
cultural or biological archetypes.('Rihanna' for instance is so far from being a cultural archetype that I and a million others have never heard of him. On the other hand the photo of a beautiful woman that you posted may well be archetypal as we have here an actual thing, a detailed photograph of a more or less important idea which is available to anyone who looks at it).