Page 41 of 44
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
by LuckyR
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:54 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 25th, 2024, 10:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 25th, 2024, 3:50 am
God is not an impossibility if there are two different opinions that can’t be cancelled out.
How can an entity without a universally agreed upon definition be impossible?
Something exists if opinions still remain or else there would be a cancelling out of opinions and there would be silence.Something doesn’t cease to exist because it is silent.
That doesn’t mean that that something is necessarily alive.
A biological computer brain is a machine with dualistic reasoning because it doesn’t know whether it exists or not with it’s binary programming. It is only an organ after all.
Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality.
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
by Jacob10
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:54 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 25th, 2024, 10:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 25th, 2024, 3:50 am
God is not an impossibility if there are two different opinions that can’t be cancelled out.
How can an entity without a universally agreed upon definition be impossible?
Something exists if opinions still remain or else there would be a cancelling out of opinions and there would be silence.Something doesn’t cease to exist because it is silent.
That doesn’t mean that that something is necessarily alive.
A biological computer brain is a machine with dualistic reasoning because it doesn’t know whether it exists or not with it’s binary programming. It is only an organ after all.
Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality.
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
There is a motor mind element to our make up which adopts dualistic (binary processing reasoning/logic).This is the automated part of our make up. Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality therefore. The automated part of our make up will default us back to the non automated part of our make up as and when required. Most are unaware of this. There is also a separate part of our make up which, if aware, can override the automated part of our make up and introduce CONTROL of the process.
If you don't believe this then what can I say other than don't believe it if you don't want to.
Personally, I don't associate the SELF (I am) with the dualistic motor mind part of my make up.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 4:00 am
by Jacob10
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:59 am
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:54 am
Something exists if opinions still remain or else there would be a cancelling out of opinions and there would be silence.Something doesn’t cease to exist because it is silent.
That doesn’t mean that that something is necessarily alive.
A biological computer brain is a machine with dualistic reasoning because it doesn’t know whether it exists or not with it’s binary programming. It is only an organ after all.
Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality.
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
There is a motor mind element to our make up which adopts dualistic (binary processing reasoning/logic).This is the automated part of our make up. Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality therefore. The automated part of our make up will default us back to the non automated part of our make up as and when required. Most are unaware of this. The non automated part of our make up, if aware, can override the automated part of our make up and introduce CONTROL of the process.
If you don't believe this then what can I say other than don't believe it if you don't want to.
Personally, I don't associate the SELF (I am) with the dualistic motor mind part of my make up.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 12:13 pm
by LuckyR
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:54 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 25th, 2024, 10:28 pm
How can an entity without a universally agreed upon definition be impossible?
Something exists if opinions still remain or else there would be a cancelling out of opinions and there would be silence.Something doesn’t cease to exist because it is silent.
That doesn’t mean that that something is necessarily alive.
A biological computer brain is a machine with dualistic reasoning because it doesn’t know whether it exists or not with it’s binary programming. It is only an organ after all.
Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality.
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
Not quite, since there isn't universal agreement, there are almost as many definitions as humans.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
by Jacob10
[bco=][/bco]
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:13 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:54 am
Something exists if opinions still remain or else there would be a cancelling out of opinions and there would be silence.Something doesn’t cease to exist because it is silent.
That doesn’t mean that that something is necessarily alive.
A biological computer brain is a machine with dualistic reasoning because it doesn’t know whether it exists or not with it’s binary programming. It is only an organ after all.
Dualistic processing/reasoning is a reality.
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
Not quite, since there isn't universal agreement, there are almost as many definitions as humans.
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
by LuckyR
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:13 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:15 am
Not seeing the relationship between what you just posted and my comment.
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
Not quite, since there isn't universal agreement, there are almost as many definitions as humans.
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
True, but no human knows what it is.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:36 pm
by Jacob10
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:13 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 3:56 am
But there is a definition but not universally agreed.
Not quite, since there isn't universal agreement, there are almost as many definitions as humans.
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
True, but no human knows what it is.
Of course we know what it is.
The correct philosophical definition for the cosmos and all the sciences is +/-=+/-
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:43 pm
by LuckyR
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:36 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:13 pm
Not quite, since there isn't universal agreement, there are almost as many definitions as humans.
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
True, but no human knows what it is.
Of course we know what it is.
The correct philosophical definition for the cosmos and all the sciences is +/-=+/-
"Of course we
believe we know what it is." (fixed it for ya)
Proof = blah, blah, blah.
Try as you might, metaphysical entities can't be shoehorned into the category of physical.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:47 pm
by Jacob10
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:43 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:36 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
True, but no human knows what it is.
Of course we know what it is.
The correct philosophical definition for the cosmos and all the sciences is +/-=+/-
"Of course we believe we know what it is." (fixed it for ya)
Proof = blah, blah, blah.
Try as you might, metaphysical entities can't be shoehorned into the category of physical.
How little you know because you are unaware.I know because I am aware.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:51 pm
by Jacob10
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:43 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:36 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 12:17 pm
There is only one correct definition.
Many incorrect definitions.
True, but no human knows what it is.
Of course we know what it is.
The correct philosophical definition for the cosmos and all the sciences is +/-=+/-
"Of course we believe we know what it is." (fixed it for ya)
Proof = blah, blah, blah.
Try as you might, metaphysical entities can't be shoehorned into the category of physical.
How little you know because you are unaware.I know because I am aware.
You cannot cancel out the equal but opposite electromagnetic forces in the cosmos as atheism claims, all you can do is balance these forces by the formula +/-=+/- so metaphysical entities are directly associated with the physical.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 1:59 pm
by Jacob10
Pass an electrical signal through the brain and it has a sinusoidal output waveform because of the the vibratory balanced electromagnetic forces in the cosmos.The electrical signal comes under the influence of push/pull forces.
The same principle applies to light wave particles passsing through space.The light wave particle comes under the influence of the same push/pull forces.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 2:01 pm
by Jacob10
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:51 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:43 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:36 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 1:28 pm
True, but no human knows what it is.
Of course we know what it is.
The correct philosophical definition for the cosmos and all the sciences is +/-=+/-
"Of course we believe we know what it is." (fixed it for ya)
Proof = blah, blah, blah.
Try as you might, metaphysical entities can't be shoehorned into the category of physical.
You cannot cancel out the equal but opposite electromagnetic forces in the cosmos as atheism claims, all you can do is balance these forces by the formula +/-=+/- so metaphysical entities are directly associated with the physical.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 2:02 pm
by Jacob10
The magnetism theory explains everything.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 26th, 2024, 6:41 pm
by LuckyR
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 2:02 pm
The magnetism theory explains everything.
It does to True Believers. You keep being you.
Re: God is an Impossibility.
Posted: February 27th, 2024, 12:27 am
by Jacob10
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2024, 2:02 pm
The magnetism theory explains everything.
What has belief or non belief got to do with sound philosophy and science or two equal but opposite electromagnetic forces that cannot be cancelled out?
Are you so unaware?
Leave belief or non belief out of it.