Philosophy Discussion Forums

We are all operating within a comfort zone. But we can agree on geometry. “It is known that geometry assumes, as things given, both the notion of space and the first principles of construction in space. She gives definitions which are merely nominal” Does your marker have any geometry?

The Beast wrote: ↑January 27th, 2025, 10:36 am We are all operating within a comfort zone. But we can agree on geometry. “It is known that geometry assumes, as things given, both the notion of space and the first principles of construction in space. She gives definitions which are merely nominal” Does your marker have any geometry?

To clarify, the marker I refered to is Time being a marker of change. I don't know how that links to the geometery of space-time or whatever you're referring to, it's over my head.

The geometry of time is a sphere. A geometrical object which is a mathematical object. Therefore, local time can be represented in the spacetime as a marker. We might situate the Earth on the spacetime (3D) and say that it is 12 hrs. (diameter). Within the Earth along the diameter twelve little Earths of one hour. So, local time that in a simulation can be scaled up or down for our comfort. The sphere can be so small as to be the size of a photon that has Quanta energy and has a known unsurpassed speed. Relations and geometry.