- October 8th, 2011, 7:23 pm
#66900
I find it misleading to declare so frequently that Beauty is subjective, because it is more appropriate to say that beauty is Subjective. Little b, big s. Human beings are products of the power of assumption over evolutionary time. They lived, the ones that did, because they guessed correctly and quickly about the environment. Beauty is a pleasurable holdover from guessing well and getting along that way. It's reinforced by survival, it gains psychological import, it becomes complex and eventually establishes humanity as the Personification of Assumption, as it were. If the scenario were reversed, and Guessing and Getting Lucky were the beings on earth, when writing fiction they would personify themselves at their height as a fictional species called Man. Beauty is a better aspect of intuition, which also includes the dread of guessing well about death. Intuition is emotive assumption as an evolved quality, to risk in order to live, reinforced by success. Intuition is not an objective measure of reality, nor is assumption, nor is beauty. If there is an objective quality in beauty, it's the slippery trait of subjectivity. It can't be objective. In a universe where uncertainty has crept even into matter, experiences like that of beauty make sense, at least in my mind, and to think of it as this living intuitive quality that is Subjective, is exciting. When it's just labeled, you know, 'subjective', it just seems to be sterile, thinking of it like that, when in reality it is so virile.