Calling that 'dishonest sensationalism', is actually dishonest.
I cited a US politician:
With regard the truth about the 9/11 attack. Would it be possible to share your motive to be involved?
"I became a political activist in the wake of watching the film JFK and doing research on the CIA. I was outraged and felt I should do something to challenge a policy which tortures, kills, and terrorizes people. "
In the case that the government has performed the attack, what would (or should) it imply?
I think it implies that our government IS a terrorist organization. Our goal is to inspire more eyewitness revelations, truthful media coverage, and a movement that will bring the responsible criminals to justice and eliminate governmental and corporate policies that enable criminal elements to commit such acts.
Dishonest is ignoring these people! They speak of eye-witness testimonies that have been ignored. No wonder that after 20 years, their call for justice is stronger than before.
As for the suggestion that 'fuel for war' might have been a motive, I don't believe that it can be considered a conspiracy theory in light of the barbarism involved in what went on, of which the book titled "Killing the Children of Iraq" by an award winning journalist, is evidence.
What barbarians would, in the words of UN specialists, destroy the water infrastructure in Iraq by which 1.5 million innocent people would die, among which 565,000 Iraqi children. They speak of 'intentional genocide'.
(2021) Intentional genocide: the targeted destruction of Iraq's water systems is a war crime (UN)
NATO military forces committed war crimes by depriving civilians of drinking water. The vast majority of the 1.5 million civilian deaths were caused not by the direct impact of bombs but by targeted destruction of water systems.
Sources:
- United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
- Water under siege in Iraq
https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/water ... -depriving
People at the time didn't want to be involved in such a war. Sy Borg recently wrote the following status quo retro-perspective idea about that war.
Sy Borg wrote: ↑January 28th, 2024, 11:25 pmSince the US killed its hegemony with its Iraq escapades, global cooperation and security have diminished.
Sy Borg wrote: ↑January 28th, 2024, 11:25 pmthe Iraq invasion, with many thousands [1.5 million people] dead, trillions wasted and soft power squandered.The question being asked, rightly so, is "what can explain controlled demolition?". Considering the nature and preceding history of the war that followed the event, the suggestion is in place.