Log In   or  Sign Up for Free
A one-of-a-kind oasis of intelligent, in-depth, productive, civil debate.
Topics are uncensored, meaning even extremely controversial viewpoints can be presented and argued for, but our Forum Rules strictly require all posters to stay on-topic and never engage in ad hominems or personal attacks.
Can you explain how slaughtering an animal on an altar can undo the mistakes you've made in your life? Well, no-one would even attempt to argue that the sacrifice of an animal could UNDO mistakes. That wasn't the purpose of the sacrificial system in Israel. Its purpose was to emphasise the COST of sin. The people in Israel were to offer costly things, like the BEST ox or the BEST sheep or an innocent creature like a dove. Why? So, the consequences of sin would be IN THE FACES OF THE SINNERS. So, THEY would choose to behave according to the principles of life they'd been given instead of sweeping their behaviour under the carpet and leaving future generations to deal with the consequences. It's about the SINNER paying the COST of his SIN.
Cheers,
enegue
Mysterio448 wrote:Can you answer a question for me: If the Hebrew practice of animal sacrifice was so special, then why is it that virtually every people and civilization in ancient times practiced animal sacrifice? Why couldn't the Hebrews invent a more original kind of symbolism for sin-atonement to accompany their lofty theological reasonings?I could suggest it's much like how a pagan day of celebration could be transformed into a Christian Holy Day. I could suggest that God originally introduced the principle of the sacrifice immediately after man was ejected from the Garden, but it had since been corrupted so badly that it needed a rebirth, which it got when the practice was formally codified by Moses.
enegue wrote:So the priesthood existed to perform sacrifices and sacrifice existed to sustain the priesthood. So basically the whole system was one big, pointless cycle to perform the exact same ritual that every other ancient people performed, only with a fancy interpretation. I think I see how it's special.
The sustenance and maintenance of the priesthood is the principle feature of the sacrifice as it was given to Moses and as it has come to Christians in the sacrifice of Jesus. The ordinances regarding the priesthood established a protocol between Israel and God that put the maintenance of the relationship in the hands of the nation. If the nation wanted to remain connected to God, then they would do what was required, otherwise they wouldn't. The OT is filled with case studies of Israel's on and off relationship with God and in the middle of it all is the maintenance or the neglect of the sacrifice.
Jesus instituted the rite of the last supper, which fulfils the same purpose as the sacrificial system in Israel. Jesus' body sustains the priesthood and his blood makes the sacrifice acceptable. The spirit of every believer is a priest who takes the lamb at the door of the tabernacle as an offering of his mind as an atonement for the sins of his mind and body. The mind places its hand, as it were, upon its head of this lamb, and accepts reponsibility for the flaying of its flesh and the shedding of its blood as the necessary protocol that will maintain the life of the believer and his relationship with God. The maintenance of this relationship is always in the hands of the believer.
Can you see how special it is, now?
Cheers,
enegue
Mysterio448 wrote:So the priesthood existed to perform sacrifices and sacrifice existed to sustain the priesthood.No. You are over simplifying by taking what I said in my last post as if that was all I said. I guess you have your reasons for wanting to do that.
Mysterio448 wrote:So basically the whole system was one big, pointless cycle to perform the exact same ritual that every other ancient people performed, only with a fancy interpretation. I think I see how it's special.No. I guess you probably don't see it, but you now have no excuse for believing your OP is a reasonable proposition.
Hawkins wrote: God's self-sacrifice can save man, legitimately and by God's Law.How did God's self-sacrifice save man? Save man from what? If the kind of "sacrifice" you're talking about is sacrifice in the sense of self-deprivation for the sake of directly effecting someone's well-being, you will have to be more specific as to how God achieved this. After all, it's not like God literally took a bullet for you, or anything that concrete. On the other hand, if you mean "sacrifice" in the sense of a ritual sacrifice, then you should explain why the almighty God would succumb to performing such a savage and irrational ritual, apparently rendering him no more sophisticated than the most backwards primitive tribes of man.
Mysterio448 wrote: How did God's self-sacrifice save man? Save man from what?From death!! 'So that you might have life eternal'.
Quotidian wrote: (Nested quote removed.)I'm curious as to why I haven't heard any Christians on this thread give me a straight answer as to whether they believe in the logic of ritual sacrifice. I'm also waiting for an explanation to why God's chosen people were commanded to atone for their sins by performing what was essentially the same savage ritual that everyone else practiced at the time.
From death!! 'So that you might have life eternal'.
I am not saying that you have to believe this but those who do believe, believe that this is what is at stake. I suppose from your viewpoint it's like a game, because you don't actually consider that those whom you are talking about really do believe this.
Quotidian wrote:From death!! 'So that you might have life eternal'.But much more than that, to save man from captivity to his flesh. The Gospel message is about freedom here and now from man's natural inclination to unruly and destructive behaviour that causes death. Eternal life is a peripheral benefit.
I am not saying that you have to believe this but those who do believe, believe that this is what is at stake.
Mysterio448 wrote:I'm curious as to why I haven't heard any Christians on this thread give me a straight answer as to whether they believe in the logic of ritual sacrifice. I'm also waiting for an explanation to why God's chosen people were commanded to atone for their sins by performing what was essentially the same savage ritual that everyone else practiced at the time.If YOU believe the sacrifice of animals in the system that operated in Israel is the same as the sacrifice of children that operated in the Phonetician system, then you are giving cause for people to believe that YOU can't discern any difference between the life of an animal and the life of a child.
How did God's self-sacrifice save man? Save man from what? If the kind of "sacrifice" you're talking about is sacrifice in the sense of self-deprivation for the sake of directly effecting someone's well-being, you will have to be more specific as to how God achieved this. After all, it's not like God literally took a bullet for you, or anything that concrete. On the other hand, if you mean "sacrifice" in the sense of a ritual sacrifice, then you should explain why the almighty God would succumb to performing such a savage and irrational ritual, apparently rendering him no more sophisticated than the most backwards primitive tribes of man.
John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”John 3:16 clearly states the reason for Jesus' (the son's) self-sacrifice. What he saved man kind from, was the debt of sin owed to his father (God), of which the justified punishment by God's law was death. Jesus' sacrifice, also opened a path for mankind to be reconciled to God, by believing and trusting (having faith) that he was the son of God, and behaving according to that trust and belief. His death acted both as a punishment and dispensation for sin. Thus, he did take “take a bullet” for us, the wrath of his father and condemnation of people, when he himself was innocent, hence the moniker of him being a sacrificial lamb. According to God's judgement, being a God of justice, the penalty for mankind's sin was death, therefore, the punishment that had to be metered out was death, so Jesus, paid the price of death, instead of mankind paying the price of death. It is not such a ritual, more a celestial legal system, which was put in place for mankind's benefit. The suffering and gruesome death of Jesus was directly carried out by people, and demonstrates two things: 1. how barbaric mankind can be to do what they did to Jesus, who was an innocent man, because the powerful and influential religious order of that time were sore jealous of him. 2. How merciful God is to allow his son to be tortured and killed in such a heinous way, by mankind, so that we could not only be forgiven of our sins, but also have a path to him. If we don't believe in Jesus, we are judged on the basis of our own sins, because we do not have the atonement which belief in him provides.
I'm curious as to why I haven't heard any Christians on this thread give me a straight answer as to whether they believe in the logic of ritual sacrifice. I'm also waiting for an explanation to why God's chosen people were commanded to atone for their sins by performing what was essentially the same savage ritual that everyone else practiced at the time.I wouldn't call myself an orthodox Christian, as there are religious aspects, ideas and ideologies of Christianity that I disagree with, but I am certainly a theist, who believes in the God of the Bible. I hope that I have given you a straight-answer pertaining to the logic of Jesus' sacrifice. I tend to think that you're looking at sacrifice in an archaic way. It was a ritual (Jesus' sacrifice being the last), but it was also judicial system of placing your sins, upon something innocent, in order to be forgiven for your sins and not face punishment. The death of the innocent animal or Jesus, is a transferral of the consequences of the sin committed by the person; to the animal or Jesus, so that the person who committed the sin and / or those who the sin would have effected, are no longer subject the consequences that sin. I think that this explanation, also explains why God's chosen people were instructed by God to sacrifice animals. What does your point about “everyone else” performing ritual sacrifice of animals pertain to?
enegue wrote: (Nested quote removed.)After reading the comments, it's my understanding that you Christians admit that the act of ritual sacrifice is superficially similar to other heathen examples of animal sacrifice, but there is a theological basis to the Jewish sacrifice that, despite all appearances, sets it apart as uniquely rational. I hope I'm understanding you correctly.
But much more than that, to save man from captivity to his flesh. The Gospel message is about freedom here and now from man's natural inclination to unruly and destructive behaviour that causes death. Eternal life is a peripheral benefit.
How did Jesus answer the rich young man's question about eternal life?
Cheers,
enegue
-- Updated Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:29 am to add the following --
(Nested quote removed.)
If YOU believe the sacrifice of animals in the system that operated in Israel is the same as the sacrifice of children that operated in the Phonetician system, then you are giving cause for people to believe that YOU can't discern any difference between the life of an animal and the life of a child.
Why doesn't that appear to you as a straight answer?
Cheers,
enegue
How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023
The more I think about this though, many peo[…]
Wow! This is a well-articulated write-up with prac[…]