Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate

[LuckyR]

My viewpoint may be biased. Because I can't trust governmental programs and stuff. The virus was created for a reason.

Oh, I hadn't heard about that. Who created the virus?

Per real evidence bruhaha by some highly investigative individuals. They conquered that secret and found it was artificially created in a laboratory through the animal bats being the reservoir of the origin. There is so much they hiding but this is the fair investigation researchers found. They did the same thing with HIV, ebola, and other diseases. Most from the Western world mostly targeted Africans. This is an opinion perspective found.

Do you know which laboratory made Covid19? Or which investigators did the research?

[Abdm28]

My viewpoint may be biased. Because I can't trust governmental programs and stuff. The virus was created for a reason.

Oh, I hadn't heard about that. Who created the virus?

Per real evidence bruhaha by some highly investigative individuals. They conquered that secret and found it was artificially created in a laboratory through the animal bats being the reservoir of the origin. There is so much they hiding but this is the fair investigation researchers found. They did the same thing with HIV, ebola, and other diseases. Most from the Western world mostly targeted Africans. This is an opinion perspective found.

Do you know which laboratory made COVID-19? Or which investigators did the research?

And how will it benefit you? It is in quote "laboratory from Wuhan". You can go dig deeper. Those investigators aren't influencers, and you won't be able to find them, but they have credentials for scientific research. Not only them, with also the deceptive analytical investigative officials. The free information on the media doesn't hold many details of a story until you get and look at the back story, the part prohibited by society (credible sources). The news, the government has an agenda and don't contribute to the matrix.

[Abdm28]

I don't want to sound certain human species but I look at a picture with in-depth details. Not the political aspect. I'm not into politics and they are all programming to deceive us. Look at the diseases, except with the road accidents, the rest is someway, somehow created. But some others may not agree.

[LuckyR]

Oh, I hadn't heard about that. Who created the virus?

Per real evidence bruhaha by some highly investigative individuals. They conquered that secret and found it was artificially created in a laboratory through the animal bats being the reservoir of the origin. There is so much they hiding but this is the fair investigation researchers found. They did the same thing with HIV, ebola, and other diseases. Most from the Western world mostly targeted Africans. This is an opinion perspective found.

Do you know which laboratory made COVID-19? Or which investigators did the research?

And how will it benefit you? It is in quote "laboratory from Wuhan". You can go dig deeper. Those investigators aren't influencers, and you won't be able to find them, but they have credentials for scientific research. Not only them, with also the deceptive analytical investigative officials. The free information on the media doesn't hold many details of a story until you get and look at the back story, the part prohibited by society (credible sources). The news, the government has an agenda and don't contribute to the matrix.

How? To determine if the story is Internet BS or not.

In the absence of details, it's taking on the vibe of schoolyard conspiracy theories. Though, again, I'm all ears on details.

[Sushan]

Abdm28

It's understandable why some people still hold onto the idea that COVID-19 originated from a lab leak in Wuhan, as it's a theory that has been discussed widely. However, current scientific evidence strongly supports a natural origin. According to multiple studies, the virus likely jumped from animals to humans, similar to other coronaviruses like SARS and MERS.

Research published in Nature and Science (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9) suggests that the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan was the initial epicenter, with multiple animal species sold there that could have transmitted the virus to humans. Additionally, genomic studies of the virus have shown no signs of genetic manipulation, a key argument against the lab-leak theory .

Though investigations have been conducted to explore the lab-leak hypothesis, including by the WHO and U.S. intelligence agencies, there hasn't been conclusive evidence supporting this theory. Many virologists and infectious disease experts argue that natural zoonotic spillover events are far more common and likely than accidental lab releases .