Page 96 of 143
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 10:59 am
by GE Morton
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:55 am
Please show me any single word that can denote without connoting. ANY one.
I didn't say words can denote without connoting. All words have connotations as well as denotative meanings. I said the line between them (for most words) is clear and sharp. Whatever connotations the barrista might associate with "coffee," they don't prevent her from handing me a cup when I order one.
All words and their meanings are artefactual.
Of course they are. Language is a human artifact.
Many make the mistake of thinking words are the true representative of Platonic forms.
Egads.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 11:04 am
by GE Morton
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 8:22 am
You're not capable of understanding what I wrote.
Could be. It would help if what you wrote was coherent.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 11:35 am
by Sculptor1
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 10:59 am
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:55 am
Please show me any single word that can denote without connoting. ANY one.
I didn't say words can denote without connoting. All words have connotations as well as denotative meanings. I said the line between them (for most words) is clear and sharp. Whatever connotations the barrista might associate with "coffee," they don't prevent her from handing me a cup when I order one.
ANyone can hand you a coffee. and you simply cannot use barrista without connoting a person's experience of barristas. indivisible.
All words and their meanings are artefactual.
Of course they are. Language is a human artifact.
Many make the mistake of thinking words are the true representative of Platonic forms.
Egads.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 1:48 pm
by Terrapin Station
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 11:04 am
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 8:22 am
You're not capable of understanding what I wrote.
Could be. It would help if what you wrote was coherent.
If there are parts you didn't understand, the prudent thing would be to ask for clarification rather than just arguing against it anyway.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 2:09 pm
by GE Morton
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 11:35 am
ANyone can hand you a coffee. and you simply cannot use barrista without connoting a person's experience of barristas. indivisible.
You seem to have missed the previous point. All words have connotations. But they don't determine what the barrista will hand me when I order a cup of coffee. The denotation does. "Coffee" may have different connotations to another waitress somewhere else. But she'll still bring me a cup of coffee.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 2:57 pm
by Sculptor1
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 2:09 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 11:35 am
ANyone can hand you a coffee. and you simply cannot use barrista without connoting a person's experience of barristas. indivisible.
You seem to have missed the previous point. All words have connotations. But they don't determine what the barrista will hand me when I order a cup of coffee.
Not even that. The last barrista I met handed me a cup of tea.
The denotation does. "Coffee" may have different connotations to another waitress somewhere else. But she'll still bring me a cup of coffee.
Of tea. or a cool glass of water.
In the US she connotes servility; in the UK, mild distain.In france grumpyness.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 19th, 2020, 6:46 pm
by GE Morton
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 2:57 pm
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 2:09 pm
You seem to have missed the previous point. All words have connotations. But they don't determine what the barrista will hand me when I order a cup of coffee.
Not even that. The last barrista I met handed me a cup of tea.
When you ordered coffee? I hope they fired her.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 3:55 am
by Belindi
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:46 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 2:57 pm
Not even that. The last barrista I met handed me a cup of tea.
When you ordered coffee? I hope they fired her.
Are you serious GEM ? Would you fire somebody for one harmless human error?
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 5:18 am
by Sculptor1
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:46 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 2:57 pm
Not even that. The last barrista I met handed me a cup of tea.
When you ordered coffee? I hope they fired her.
For some reason barrista connotes a female in your mind.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 9:39 am
by GE Morton
Belindi wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 3:55 am
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:46 pm
When you ordered coffee? I hope they fired her.
Are you serious GEM ? Would you fire somebody for one harmless human error?
Heh. No. The presumption was that she made those errors constantly (which she would do if she attached a meaning to "coffee" different from that of her customers).
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 9:40 am
by GE Morton
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 5:18 am
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 19th, 2020, 6:46 pm
When you ordered coffee? I hope they fired her.
For some reason barrista connotes a female in your mind.
Yep. So? What has that do to with the issue?
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 4:01 pm
by Sculptor1
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 9:40 am
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 5:18 am
For some reason barrista connotes a female in your mind.
Yep. So? What has that do to with the issue?
Because a word is inspearable from its connotations.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 20th, 2020, 5:13 pm
by GE Morton
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 4:01 pm
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 9:40 am
Yep. So? What has that do to with the issue?
Because a word is inspearable from its connotations.
The connotations a word may have in any particular mind may not be separable from it in that mind, but those are quite separable from its denotative meaning. The barista will still deliver the cup of coffee ordered regardless of whatever connotations she may attach to "coffee."
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 21st, 2020, 4:54 am
by Belindi
GE Morton wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 9:39 am
Belindi wrote: ↑August 20th, 2020, 3:55 am
Are you serious GEM ? Would you fire somebody for one harmless human error?
Heh. No. The presumption was that she made those errors constantly (which she would do if she attached a meaning to "coffee" different from that of her customers).
It's a simple fact of a good trainer that they don't presume the trainee knows the local culture. In other words, people can and do learn from experience. Learning from experience includes the learning to substitute one culture for another.
Coffee and tea are not sentient. We can't empathise with coffee or tea, and never will. Sentience is a biological fact as we know state of the art biology. So sentience is where the cultural relativity buck stops.
Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: August 21st, 2020, 9:08 am
by GE Morton
Belindi wrote: ↑August 21st, 2020, 4:54 am
It's a simple fact of a good trainer that they don't presume the trainee knows the local culture. In other words, people can and do learn from experience. Learning from experience includes the learning to substitute one culture for another.
Coffee and tea are not sentient. We can't empathise with coffee or tea, and never will. Sentience is a biological fact as we know state of the art biology. So sentience is where the cultural relativity buck stops.
???
I'm not sure what all that has to do with the issue under discussion, i.e., whether the denotative meanings of words are distinct from their (subjective) connotations.