Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate

Humans-Only Club for Discussion & Debate

A one-of-a-kind oasis of intelligent, in-depth, productive, civil debate.

Topics are uncensored, meaning even extremely controversial viewpoints can be presented and argued for, but our Forum Rules strictly require all posters to stay on-topic and never engage in ad hominems or personal attacks.


Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
#337194
GaryLouisSmith quizzed me:
Why do you think we don't experience the objects of reason as real things external to our thinking about them?
We experience objects of reason, such as is the right angled triangle on a plane surface, but we cannot experience the perfection of right angled triangles except as a mind object.

Whereas I may claim to know the perfection of red, or scrambled eggs, or musical performances, and most other experiences in my mind these claims are always subjective. Whereas the perfection of right angled triangles is proven and defined by the theorem for all to see and understand because deductive reason is democratic.


Philosophical naturalists can claim certain natural events such as clear mountain streams, or the songs of nightingales, or thriving apple trees, or babies, are universals that transcend the experiences from which they are abstracted. But we can't prove this to be true . We can prove the transcendent truth of right angled triangles on plane surfaces.

Reason is a worthy contender for the way to truth, goodness and beauty.

If as you say you see the Boy as transcendent, then you descend in line from the Romantics, the philosophical naturalists. You can hardly have been unaware of that historical line of ideas. Reason, however, is a safeguard against Romantic excesses such as undue worship of the savage and pagan.
#337204
Belindi wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 5:50 amWe experience objects of reason, such as is the right angled triangle on a plane surface, but we cannot experience the perfection of right angled triangles except as a mind object.
You're talking about geometric imagination, with imagination in general being different from perception. You don't perceive what you imagine.
Location: Germany
#337209
Consul wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 1:31 pm
Belindi wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 5:50 amWe experience objects of reason, such as is the right angled triangle on a plane surface, but we cannot experience the perfection of right angled triangles except as a mind object.
You're talking about geometric imagination, with imagination in general being different from perception. You don't perceive what you imagine.
I often perceive in my environment what I first perceive as a memory resulting from past perceptions: I perceive a memory of my bedroom, and subsequently perceive the bedroom in my environment is exactly as my memory had previously perceived it.

'perception' is usually used as pertaining to information from the brain-mind's environment.However neuroscientists know memories too supply information . The neuronal involvement is much the same whether information source is internal or external.

A subject's memories and that subject's perceptions are personal in the sense that that subject has privileged access to the perception, whichever information source applies. The Pythagoras Theorem can be perceived by anyone without privileged access. The information of such as the Pythagoras theorem is not synthetic information but analytic.

Alongside the perfect right angled triangle on a plane surface, i.e. the analytic proposition, we have a lot of manifested right angled triangles that are imperfect like in Plato's Cave.
God can be proved analytically like Spinoza did .In that case nature naturing itself is analogous to the perfect right angled triangle on a plane surface making possible its imperfect manifestations for a lot of practical purposes.
#337210
Belindi wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 4:04 pm
Consul wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 1:31 pmYou're talking about geometric imagination, with imagination in general being different from perception. You don't perceive what you imagine.
I often perceive in my environment what I first perceive as a memory resulting from past perceptions: I perceive a memory of my bedroom, and subsequently perceive the bedroom in my environment is exactly as my memory had previously perceived it.
Recollection in the form of memorial experiences is a kind of imagination rather than perception. When you imagine your bedroom, you don't perceive it; and when you perceive it, you don't imagine it.
Location: Germany
#337211
Belindi wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 4:04 pm'perception' is usually used as pertaining to information from the brain-mind's environment.However neuroscientists know memories too supply information . The neuronal involvement is much the same whether information source is internal or external.
Yes, memory or recollection is a source of knowledge; but it's different from perception—although you cannot (veridically) recall or remember what you didn't perceive. (But you can certainly non-memorially imagine what you didn't perceive.)
Location: Germany
#337212
Consul wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 4:31 pmYes, memory or recollection is a source of knowledge; but it's different from perception—although you cannot (veridically) recall or remember what you didn't perceive. (But you can certainly non-memorially imagine what you didn't perceive.)
(Veridical) Recollections depend on prior perceptions.
Location: Germany
#337217
Belindi wrote: September 3rd, 2019, 5:50 am GaryLouisSmith quizzed me:
Why do you think we don't experience the objects of reason as real things external to our thinking about them?
We experience objects of reason, such as is the right angled triangle on a plane surface, but we cannot experience the perfection of right angled triangles except as a mind object.

Whereas I may claim to know the perfection of red, or scrambled eggs, or musical performances, and most other experiences in my mind these claims are always subjective. Whereas the perfection of right angled triangles is proven and defined by the theorem for all to see and understand because deductive reason is democratic.


Philosophical naturalists can claim certain natural events such as clear mountain streams, or the songs of nightingales, or thriving apple trees, or babies, are universals that transcend the experiences from which they are abstracted. But we can't prove this to be true . We can prove the transcendent truth of right angled triangles on plane surfaces.

Reason is a worthy contender for the way to truth, goodness and beauty.

If as you say you see the Boy as transcendent, then you descend in line from the Romantics, the philosophical naturalists. You can hardly have been unaware of that historical line of ideas. Reason, however, is a safeguard against Romantic excesses such as undue worship of the savage and pagan.
When I was in High School I loved geometry, algebra and Spanish grammar. Earlier I had learned to diagram sentences on the blackboard. I was not on my way to being either an engineer or a linguist. Rather I stared at those forms, including right-angled triangles, as mystical doorways into another world. They were supernatural beings. I can still feel that feeling.

The forms of mathematics and grammar are mystically beyond the practical mind. They are from the Excess. They are outside the domestic orderliness of the natural world. They go bump in the night. Bhairava. From Wikipedia -

Bhairava originates from the word bhīru, which means "fearful". Bhairava means "terribly fearful form". It is also known as one who destroys fear or one who is beyond fear. The right interpretation is that he protects his devotees from dreadful enemies, greed, lust and anger. Bhairava protects his devotees from these enemies. These enemies are dangerous as they never allow humans to seek God within. There is also another interpretation: Bha means creation, ra means sustenance and va means destruction. Therefore, Bhairava is the one who creates, sustains and dissolves the three stages of life. Therefore, he becomes the ultimate or the supreme.[12]
The origin of Bhairava can be traced to a conversation between Brahma and Vishnu which is recounted in the Shiva Mahapuranam[13]. In it, Vishnu inquired of Brahma, "Who is the supreme creator of the Universe?" Arrogantly, Brahma told Vishnu to worship him as Supreme Creator. One day, Brahma thought "I have five heads. Shiva also has five heads. I can do everything that Shiva does and therefore I am Shiva." Brahma became a little egotistical as a result of this. Additionally, he began to forget the work of Shiva and also started interfering in what Shiva was supposed to be doing. Consequently, Mahadeva(Shiva) threw a small nail from his finger which assumed the form of Kala Bhairava and casually went to cut off one of Brahma's heads. The skull (Kapala) of Brahma is held in the hands of Kala Bhairava, Brahma’s ego was destroyed and he became enlightened. From then on, he became useful to himself and to the world, and deeply grateful to Shiva. In the form of the Kala Bhairava, Shiva is said to be guarding each of these Shaktipeeth (Shakti temples). Each Shaktipeeth is accompanied by a temple dedicated to Bhairava.[14][15]
There is another school of thought which says that Shiva himself created Bhairava. There was one demon by name Dahurāsuraṇ who got a boon that he could be killed only by a woman. Kali was invoked by Parvati to kill him. The wrath of Kali killed the demon. After killing the demon, her wrath metamorphosed as a child. Kali fed the child with her milk. Shiva made both Kali and the child to merge with him. From this merged form of Shiva, Bhairava appeared in his eight forms (Aṣṭāṅga Bhairavas). Since Bhairava was thus created by Shiva, he is said to be one of the sons of Shiva.[16]
Puranas too give different versions of Bhairava. In this version there was a war between gods and demons. To eradicate the demons, Shiva created Kala Bhairava from whom Aṣṭāṅga Bhairavas were created. These Ashta Bhairavas got married to Ashta Matrikas. These Ashta Bhairavas and Ashta Matrikas have dreadful forms. From these Ashta Bhairavas and Ashta Matrikas, 64 Bhairavas and 64 Yoginis were created.[17]
Normally in Shiva temples, idols of Bhairava are situated in the north, facing southern direction. He is also called Kṣhetrapāla. He appears in a standing position with four hands. His weapons are drum, pāśa (noose), trident and skull. In some forms of Bhairava, there are more than four hands. He appears without dress and with a dog. His weapons, the dog, protruding teeth, terrifying looks, and a garland with red flowers all give him a frightening appearance.[18][19]
In all Shiva temples, regular puja (reverence) rituals begin with Surya and end with Bhairava. Bhairava likes ghee bath (abhiṣeka), red flowers, ghee lamp, unbroken coconut, honey, boiled food, fibrous fruits etc. If a Bhairava idol is facing west, it is good; facing south is moderate; facing east is not good. The right time to pray to Bhairavi is midnight. During midnight it is said that Bhairava and his consort Bhairavi will give darśana (appearance) to their devotees. The most appropriate time is a Friday midnight. There are eight types of flowers and leaves used in archana (अर्चन) to Bhairava.[20][21]
Bhairava is the ultimate form of manifestation or pure "I" consciousness. This form is called Svarṇākarṣṇa Bhairava. He has red or blue complexion and is clothed in golden dress. He has the moon over his head. He has four hands, one of which he holds a golden vessel. He gives wealth and prosperity. Performing pūja on Tuesdays gives quick results. In some of the ancient texts he is said to have thirty two hands, the shape of a bird, golden complexion, terrible teeth, and a human form above the hip. Worshipping him destroys enemies.[22][23]
Some forms of Bhairava are guardians of the eight cardinal points. There are 64 Bhairavas. These 64 Bhairavas are grouped under 8 categories and each category is headed by one major Bhairava. The major eight Bhairavas are called Aṣṭāṅga Bhairavas. The Ashta Bhairavas control the 8 directions of this universe. Each Bhairava has seven sub Bhairavas under him, totaling 64 Bhairavas. All of the Bhairavas are ruled and controlled by Maha Swarna Kala Bhairava otherwise known as Kala Bhairava, who is the supreme ruler of time of this universe as per some Śaiva tantric scriptures (āgamas). Bhairavi is the consort of Kala Bhairava.[24] The eight Bhairavas are said to represent five elements viz. ākāś, air, fire, water and earth and the other three being sun, moon and ātman. Each of the eight Bhairavas are different in appearance, have different weapons, different vāhanas (vehicles) and they bless their devotees with eight types of wealth representing Ashta Lakshmis. Continuous worship of Bhairava leads the worshiper to a true Guru. There are separate mantras to all the eight Bhairavas.[25]
Bhairava is also called upon as protector, as he guards the eight directions of the universe. In Shiva temples, when the temple is closed, the keys are placed before Bhairava. Bhairava is also described as the protector of women. He is described as the protector of the timid and in general women who are timid in nature.[26][27]
It is generally believed that worshiping Bhairava gives prosperity, success and good progeny, prevents premature death and gives solution to debts and liabilities. Different forms of Bhairava evolve only from Śiva, who is called the Mahā Bhairava.[28][29][30]

Buddhism also adopted Bhairava (Tibetan: 'Jigs byed; Chinese: Buwei) as a deity and a dharmapala or dharma protector.[32] The various buddhist forms of Bhairava (variously called Herukas, Vajrabhairava, Mahākāla and Yamantaka) are considered fierce deities and yidams (tantric meditational deity) in Tibetan Buddhism. They also have their own set of buddhist tantras, the Vajrabhairava tantras.[33] According to Tibetan tradition, these tantras were revealed to Lalitavajra in Oddiyana in the 10th century.[34] These texts play a particularly important role in the Sarma (new translation) traditions of Tibetan Buddhism, especially among the Gelug school where Vajrabhairava is one of the three central highest yoga tantra practices of the lineage.[35] Because of this, it is also popular in Mongolia as a protector deity and was also popular among the Manchus.[35] The deity is also central to Newar Buddhism.[36] The tantric practices associated with Bhairava focus on the transformation of anger and hatred into understanding.[36]
Favorite Philosopher: Gustav Bergmann Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
#337222
Thanks for directing me to Bhairava.
It's a fact of life (we are natural animals) we have to have egos otherwise we could not survive. Egos are the psychological manifestations of libido or will to survive.

Unless I misunderstand, and I'm unfamiliar with eastern philosophy and its poetic myths, Bhairava inspires fear because we think our egos are the central structures of our selves.Therefore it can be a frightening prospect to be stripped of ego.

Jesus replied, "Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again."

I quite understand how you unwittingly came to use these mysterious structures as mantras.
#337226
Belindi wrote: September 4th, 2019, 5:51 am Thanks for directing me to Bhairava.
It's a fact of life (we are natural animals) we have to have egos otherwise we could not survive. Egos are the psychological manifestations of libido or will to survive.

Unless I misunderstand, and I'm unfamiliar with eastern philosophy and its poetic myths, Bhairava inspires fear because we think our egos are the central structures of our selves.Therefore it can be a frightening prospect to be stripped of ego.

Jesus replied, "Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again."

I quite understand how you unwittingly came to use these mysterious structures as mantras.
The interpretation you give to Bhairava is rather common even among Hindu pundits. I think it is a way of turning wine back into water. Psychologism is not my way of thinking about these matters. I would prefer to leave the story of Bhairava uninterpreted. That way I can keep its power. That Biblical quote you gave has an interesting aspect to it. The Greek work translated as "born again" is "anothen". Literally it means from above. Sometimes in Greek it did mean again, much as we say "from the top". Some Bibles actually might translate that passage as "Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born from above". https://pilosopongtasyoweb.wordpress.co ... jano-spms/

A mantra is something else again and I would never use those structures as mantras, but that's a whole other topic.
Favorite Philosopher: Gustav Bergmann Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
#337227
The urge to interpret must matter for making sense of where we find ourselves in the world. If you don't like to interpret a myth/poem you must be elevating form over meaning.

The way I was taught to meditate my mantra had to be all form and no meaning.

If you mention Bhairava on a philosophy website where people do a lot of interpreting, aren't you risking your need for the myth/poem to be devotional/performative ? I mean, casting pearls before swine.
#337239
Belindi wrote: September 4th, 2019, 8:36 am The urge to interpret must matter for making sense of where we find ourselves in the world. If you don't like to interpret a myth/poem you must be elevating form over meaning.

The way I was taught to meditate my mantra had to be all form and no meaning.

If you mention Bhairava on a philosophy website where people do a lot of interpreting, aren't you risking your need for the myth/poem to be devotional/performative ? I mean, casting pearls before swine.
Susan Sontag used to be very famous and well-loved among the literati and the intelligentsia, but now she has apparently fallen on hard times,


http://shifter-magazine.com/wp-content/ ... tation.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_Interpretation
Favorite Philosopher: Gustav Bergmann Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
#337245
Thanks for the links.
Here is what I think sums up the problem of form and meaning, it's from the shifter magazine link.
The old style of interpretation was insistent, but respectful;
it erected another meaning on top of the literal one. The modern style of
interpretation excavates, and as it excavates, destroys; it digs “behind” the
text, to find a sub-text which is the true one.
I am pretty sure I interpret like the "old style". Layers of meaning which are enhanced with feelings and sensuousness that can be appreciated entirely for the literal interpretation which is the closest to pure form.When more intellectual interpretations are concerned the literal meaning combined with the pure form keeps the intellect from the burden of emotional flatness. At best the attention slides around among the form , the literal meaning, and the sub-texts.

There is never a "true sub-text". Only sub-texts that appeal to the subjective consciousness of the interpreter. And He said to them, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

The Sick Rose
BY WILLIAM BLAKE
O Rose thou art sick.
The invisible worm,
That flies in the night
In the howling storm:

Has found out thy bed
Of crimson joy:
And his dark secret love
Does thy life destroy.


Indian and Chinese myth/poetry is almost a closed book to me and I can only think of the few poems, plays and so on I do know.
#337256
Belindi wrote: September 4th, 2019, 6:29 pm Thanks for the links.
Here is what I think sums up the problem of form and meaning, it's from the shifter magazine link.
The old style of interpretation was insistent, but respectful;
it erected another meaning on top of the literal one. The modern style of
interpretation excavates, and as it excavates, destroys; it digs “behind” the
text, to find a sub-text which is the true one.
I am pretty sure I interpret like the "old style". Layers of meaning which are enhanced with feelings and sensuousness that can be appreciated entirely for the literal interpretation which is the closest to pure form.When more intellectual interpretations are concerned the literal meaning combined with the pure form keeps the intellect from the burden of emotional flatness. At best the attention slides around among the form , the literal meaning, and the sub-texts.

There is never a "true sub-text". Only sub-texts that appeal to the subjective consciousness of the interpreter. And He said to them, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear!”

The Sick Rose
BY WILLIAM BLAKE
O Rose thou art sick.
The invisible worm,
That flies in the night
In the howling storm:

Has found out thy bed
Of crimson joy:
And his dark secret love
Does thy life destroy.


Indian and Chinese myth/poetry is almost a closed book to me and I can only think of the few poems, plays and so on I do know.
In Kirtipur where the university I belong to is located there is a temple to Bagh Bhairav, the fearsome tiger. https://honeyguideapps.com/blog/bagh-bh ... ipur-nepal If you go there at midnight on certain nights and meditate you may be able to see the fearsome eyes of that tiger. Or maybe Bhairav himself. Or a skull that was the head of Brahma. Or some other entity that is part of the myth of Bhairav.

In other words, it isn't a matter of interpretation, it a matter of direct vision.
Favorite Philosopher: Gustav Bergmann Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
  • 1
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 124

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II
by Dr. Joseph M. Feagan
April 2025

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)
by Maitreya Dasa
March 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science
by Lia Russ
December 2024

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


My misgivings about the Golden Rule

How about a slight variation on the Golden Rule: […]

It’s not just about victim blaming for showing exc[…]

Hitler's model - that relied on plundering the[…]

Look at nature and you'll see hierarchies ever[…]