Belinda wrote: ↑May 3rd, 2024, 4:18 amThe ideas of Sigmund Freud's id, ego, and superego offer a psychological framework for comprehending these various forms of "true selves." The superego, the area of our brain that internalizes morals and societal norms, may be aligned with the person who maintains that regulations should be rigidly followed. This could account for the strong sense of accountability they have for both their deeds and the impression they give off to people around them.Gerrard Mark wrote: ↑May 3rd, 2024, 1:39 am Various factors can hinder the expression of our true authentic selves, including societal norms, fear of judgment or rejection, self-doubt, past traumas, and external pressures to conform. Embracing one's true self often requires courage, self-awareness, and acceptance of vulnerability.Some individuals authentically believe that there are rules which they must and ought to obey. If these rules are not obeyed, the individual who fails to pay attention to them will not only be scorned for himself but his family, friends, and business associates will be tainted.Such an individual is a true self.
Other individuals authentically believe that feelings are to be trusted whether or not their feelings lead to dangerous and risky behaviour. Such an individual is a true self.
There is also the sort of person who tempers their feelings with reason and does not get carried away by their passions. This is also a true self.
Those who follow their instincts, however, may be doing so because they believe in their feelings, even if they cause them to act dangerously. As our primordial inclinations push us towards instant gratification regardless of the consequences, Freud thought the id to be a representation of our nature. It's more motivated by impulses and desires, even though this can be considered an authentic self.
The Aristotelian concept of 'phronesis', or practical wisdom, comes to mind when one considers the third sort of person, who tempers their emotions with reason. According to Aristotle, a well-rounded person develops virtues by striking a balance between their feelings and rational thought. This is in line with what we view as a balanced way of living—one that neither rejects emotions nor allows them to carelessly guide decisions.
These personality types' conflicts have historically been seen in a lot of societies. Think about the rigid moral standards of some historical periods, such as Victorian England, where people were held to high standards not only for their personal conduct but also for the ways in which their deeds affected their families and communities. The countercultural movements of the 1960s, on the other hand, encouraged people to reject these strict conventions and instead follow their feelings and desires more freely.
– William James