Eckhart Aurelius Hughes wrote: ↑August 10th, 2023, 2:50 am
Sushan wrote: ↑August 5th, 2023, 8:14 am
We see a mother's intuition alerting her that something is amiss with her child and, subsequently, her unyielding will to keep her son alive, to foster hope and happiness despite the grim prognosis. This instinctive drive and emotional resilience reflect the core essence of Stoicism - the idea of maintaining equanimity in the face of adversity.
Can a deep-seated intuition, like that of a parent, coupled with resilience, guide us in embodying stoic principles when we encounter life’s adversities?
Good question! I think it can easily go both ways. Deep love-like feelings, such as a parent has for a child, can on the one hand easily be the perfect motivation to be strong, be resilient, and exercise free-spirited transcendence (e.g. bravery). But just as easily it can do the opposite and be the very thing that makes one desperate, clingy, and cower in fear or dishonest denial of the truth.
My own book talks about that razor's edge a lot as well as in it's comparisons between what it calls (1) true love vs (2) toxic pseudo-love, namely codependency and abusive love-hate relationships.
A terribly abusive parent who is miserable (i.e. lacking inner peace) still has a lot in common with a happy, truly loving parent.
As chaos theory teaches us, two sets of train tracks can start in nearly the same exact spot but end up going in very different directions and end up in very different places.
I appreciate the insight you've shared, particularly the analogy with the two sets of train tracks stemming from chaos theory. It's true that the intense emotions rooted in deep love, as between a parent and a child, can manifest in divergent ways. While Mary Ellen Louis's story exemplifies the transformative power of love leading to resilience and strength, there are indeed instances where this bond may result in fear, despair, or even denial.
Your distinction between "true love" and "toxic pseudo-love" is valuable in this discussion. It's important to recognize that even when the intent might be genuine love, the manifestation of that love can sometimes be harmful or misguided. It's also thought-provoking to consider that the starting point, the deep-seated emotion or intent, can be almost identical, yet the outcomes can be vastly different.
Your comment leads me to ponder: What factors or elements play a pivotal role in determining the trajectory from this starting point? Is it a culmination of personal experiences, internal beliefs, external influences, or perhaps a combination of all these? And to bring it back to Stoicism, can understanding and internalizing Stoic principles steer one more reliably toward the path of true love and resilience, as opposed to a path characterized by toxic behaviors and relationships?