Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate

[Eckhart Aurelius Hughes]

This forum topic is posted in the discussion forum for the May 2024 Philosophy Book of the Month, Neither Safe Nor Effective (2nd Edition): The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines by Dr. Colleen Huber.


Below are some excerpts from an interesting article by a registered Democrat who suffered a vaccine injury:

"With the vaccine mandate from my employer at the top of my mind, I proceeded, against my own medical judgment. "

"After the second dose, my condition rapidly worsened. I developed positional tachycardia, wildly fluctuating blood pressures, internal tremors, electrical zap sensations on my legs, intense right-sided headaches, abdominal pain and severe tinnitus. I struggle to live with all of this and more to this day."

"The reluctance to engage in honest, open dialogue about vaccine injuries perpetuates unnecessary suffering and isolation for the thousands affected."

"Medical gaslighting, coupled with the absence of legal recourse or adequate compensation, compounds the challenges we endure. When I reach out for help, my pleas often fall on deaf ears, or I am disparaged as a misinformed 'anti-vaxxer'."

View the full article:
The medical community must stop gaslighting COVID vaccine victims like me


What do you think?

[Raymonda Onwuka 1]

It is usually hard for the medical community to accept the wrong things they are doing until it becomes too late. I know it is not easy but my advice is " do not take any drugs or vaccines because you are being forced to." Maintain your health decision at all cost.

[Sushan]

I read the whole article and thank you for sharing this. Acknowledging vaccine adverse effects is crucial, and this story underscores the need for better support and compensation mechanisms for those affected.

However, there are a few points that need further scrutiny.

The assertion that no one is listening might be an overstatement, given that major platforms like the New York Times have covered this story. This indicates some level of recognition and dialogue.

The comparison between the CICP and VICP highlights significant flaws in the CICP. Yet, it would be beneficial to provide more data on how these flaws directly impact claimants beyond personal experience. Concrete evidence and broader statistics could strengthen the argument for legislative changes.

The call for honest, open dialogue about vaccine injuries is vital, but it's essential to balance this with the public health benefits of vaccines. While adverse effects are real and need addressing, it's important not to undermine the overall success of vaccination programs.