- April 12th, 2024, 9:33 am
#460029
I understand the point Scott is driving at and the underlining reason behind his believe that evil does not exist. If we accept the past as what we could not have changed, as it was bound to happen, then we don't consider it as evil. However, I will consider this definition of evil as narrow and confined. On a broader perspective, evil exist in other forms, such as in a situation whereby someone decided to cause harm to another fellow probably because of something they could have have forgiveness for. Or someone can unknowingly offend their fellow, like emotionally. The offended did not speak out that they were offended, then they tried to harm the fellow without letting them know who actually caused the harm. With this type of evil, that is intentionally caused by a physically present fellow, can be prevented but still happened because someone decided it and want it to happen by all cost. Even in many cases the person that offended knows that someone is about to cause them evil, which means they could have prevented it, but might not be able to prevent it even after knowing it is coming. Evil exist far from what we don't have control over.
In conclusion, I so much love the idea that evil does not exist by believing that it's just happened because it is not in our control and it is probably bound to happen. I.e., there is nothing like "ought not"; hence, nothing to be called evil. This mentally helps one to move on easily after one failure or disappointment at life. However, this is only one form in which evil can exist. There are other forms in which evil exists.