Sy Borg wrote: ↑February 27th, 2024, 6:49 pm
Jacob10 wrote: ↑February 27th, 2024, 6:26 pm
Atheistic philosophy and science is an impossibility because it doesn’t explain the psychological.
We have to remember that atheistic science freely admits that it doesn’t know what force cause it’s (mythical) single Big Bang and tries to explain its (mythical) Big Crunch with a still unknown force.
These are the facts.
Not very good is it?
Joshua, by "the psychological" I assume you refer to the hard problem of consciousness. You complain that science has not worked it out, but religion sure hasn't. Same applies with the universe's history.
All you can do is apply the God of the Gaps, a known logical fallacy.
I am referring to everything associated with the brain/mind interface including consciousness.This is where atheism is the weakest which is why it doesn’t understand consciousness.Atheism claims that the individual does not exist but this is a known fallacy.We know this by just one word,CONTROL.
If the individual doesn’t exist then no psychological control is possible.However,as all individual do exist then psychological control is possible.Clearly,an atheists isn’t going to introduce psychological control if they have been persuaded that they don’t exist to be able to introduce that control.Not all individuals are atheists though and therefore some do introduce psychological control.This is how some non atheists know that atheistic philosophy and science is incorrect and discard it immediately for an alternative philosophy and science that is correct because it explains the psychological. As I have said to Belindi,I have found what I am looking for so I don’t debate with atheists with the possibility of being persuaded by their belief system which I know is incorrect. No,not at all.