Belindi wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 3:55 am All infectious diseases are opportunistic to some degree.I'm not sure what else they are!
Log In   or  Sign Up for Free
A one-of-a-kind oasis of intelligent, in-depth, productive, civil debate.
Topics are uncensored, meaning even extremely controversial viewpoints can be presented and argued for, but our Forum Rules strictly require all posters to stay on-topic and never engage in ad hominems or personal attacks.
Belindi wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 7:30 amIt was the word "some" degree that I thought odd. Since viruses do nothing other than exploit the living systems of host cells, it seems the main thing they do is take opportunities as they present.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 4:49 amHow do you mean? You must know characteristics of infectious diseases other than that they are opportunistic!
I'm not sure what else they are!
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 10:13 amI see. Some specific pathogens are more/have been more invasive or virulent than others and will cause diseases whether or not the host is undernourished, overworked, or living in overcrowded housing. Smallpox was like this as it was a health risk for rich and poor individuals alike at the stage of initial invasion and at the stage of development of virus (or bacteria if the invader was syphilis bacteria) within the host.Belindi wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 7:30 amIt was the word "some" degree that I thought odd. Since viruses do nothing other than exploit the living systems of host cells, it seems the main thing they do is take opportunities as they present.
How do you mean? You must know characteristics of infectious diseases other than that they are opportunistic!
Belindi wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 5:54 amSo the thought was, since the degree of opportunism is not a factor of the virus, but a factor of the host, the opportunity relates to the host which/who allows the opportunity.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 10:13 amI see. Some specific pathogens are more/have been more invasive or virulent than others and will cause diseases whether or not the host is undernourished, overworked, or living in overcrowded housing. Smallpox was like this as it was a health risk for rich and poor individuals alike at the stage of initial invasion and at the stage of development of virus (or bacteria if the invader was syphilis bacteria) within the host.
It was the word "some" degree that I thought odd. Since viruses do nothing other than exploit the living systems of host cells, it seems the main thing they do is take opportunities as they present.
However all pathogens are opportunistic in the general sense as you describe .
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 6:46 amVirus has properties that not alive poisons don't have, due I understand to these nasty spikey things that latch on. Some plants do latching- on, sticky willy (cleavers)for instanceBelindi wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 5:54 amSo the thought was, since the degree of opportunism is not a factor of the virus, but a factor of the host, the opportunity relates to the host which/who allows the opportunity.
I see. Some specific pathogens are more/have been more invasive or virulent than others and will cause diseases whether or not the host is undernourished, overworked, or living in overcrowded housing. Smallpox was like this as it was a health risk for rich and poor individuals alike at the stage of initial invasion and at the stage of development of virus (or bacteria if the invader was syphilis bacteria) within the host.
However all pathogens are opportunistic in the general sense as you describe .
Opportunities smack of volition which can probably be rejected as thing that can apply to a non conscious entity. Viruses are one step above chemicals. Just seems a bit odd to say that, say, a poison, can take the opportunity to attack the poisoned.
Belindi wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 1:00 pmViruses are not motive. Poisons "latch on" to neurons too.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 6:46 amVirus has properties that not alive poisons don't have, due I understand to these nasty spikey things that latch on. Some plants do latching- on, sticky willy (cleavers)for instance
So the thought was, since the degree of opportunism is not a factor of the virus, but a factor of the host, the opportunity relates to the host which/who allows the opportunity.
Opportunities smack of volition which can probably be rejected as thing that can apply to a non conscious entity. Viruses are one step above chemicals. Just seems a bit odd to say that, say, a poison, can take the opportunity to attack the poisoned.
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 5:09 pmThat is the point I was making. Latching-on to cells is not always motivated or even evidence of lifeBelindi wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 1:00 pm Virus has properties that not alive poisons don't have, due I understand to these nasty spikey things that latch on. Some plants do latching- on, sticky willy (cleavers)for instanceViruses are not motive. Poisons "latch on" to neurons too.
Count Lucanor wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2020, 9:09 pmIt's too early to tell about what's going on exactly with COVID-19, but if you can provide references to such studies, it would be useful. I suspect people die from the effects of the virus in vital organs such as lungs and kidneys, which is why more deaths occur among the elderly and people with previous health conditions. If that's what is meant by "other factors" I don't see any major disagreement with what has been said so far.Context is important, especially when deciphering conflicting news etc. So, I’ll share studies as well as other data. I’d appreciate your thoughts on this.
Newme wrote: ↑October 1st, 2020, 4:00 pmAll of this is consistent with what had been reported since the early days of the pandemic. I don't see nothing new here. It's comorbidity.Count Lucanor wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2020, 9:09 pmIt's too early to tell about what's going on exactly with COVID-19, but if you can provide references to such studies, it would be useful. I suspect people die from the effects of the virus in vital organs such as lungs and kidneys, which is why more deaths occur among the elderly and people with previous health conditions. If that's what is meant by "other factors" I don't see any major disagreement with what has been said so far.Context is important, especially when deciphering conflicting news etc. So, I’ll share studies as well as other data. I’d appreciate your thoughts on this.
99% of patients killed by coronavirus in Italy had existing illnesses
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... finds.html
CDC: 94% of Covid-19 deaths had underlying medical conditions
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... r-BB18wrA7
Newme wrote: ↑October 1st, 2020, 4:00 pm On the chart in link below, look at the flu, pneumonia & covid deaths over the last several years. Notice as flu & pneumonia deaths went down, covid deaths went up - covid was blamed for other deaths to try to scare people & justify tyrannical actions. And 2018? Why no shut downs or masks bs then - when it was worse than the same time 2020?What the graphic shows is a consistent pattern of peaks and valleys of deaths by pneumonia and influenza for around 5 years, a pattern that does not seem to show anomalies in the months in which COVID-19 deaths appear. It also shows a fast increase in COVID-19 deaths in a few months. This is consistent with what had been reported and I don't see any conspiracy to "scare people and justify tyrannical actions". Bear in mind that you're looking at death rates here, not infection rates, and since viral pneumonia is a complication from flu or colds, the graph would have to show the fatality rate of these conditions and how they compare to the corona viruses family. Here is some insight on this:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... -data.html
Research so far indicates that COVID-19 spreads more easily and has a higher death rate than the flu.
Newme wrote: ↑October 1st, 2020, 4:00 pm What adds to the lack of trust are scripted news like this: https://youtu.be/eUTF6MIBs-4The video is not available (removed by the uploader).
Newme wrote: ↑October 1st, 2020, 4:00 pm A rough timeline to consider:Sorry I didn't go through all the links provided, but a broad view shows this in the neighborhood of conspiracy theory. Not worth it.
Newme wrote: ↑October 2nd, 2020, 12:29 pm “The term Conspiracy Theory was created by the CIA in 1967 as a way to discredit anyone who dared to challenge their official version of the truth.”That by itself is a conspiracy theory.
Sure, there are some crazy notions of big foot etc., but it’s mixed in with truth, to discredit inconvenient facts.
Newme wrote: ↑November 8th, 2020, 2:48 pm Your sweeping dismissal of facts told me you mislabeled it “conspiracy theory” to feel justified in not addressing facts you may not know what to do with.I gave you the proper arguments to show that the facts point in a different direction than what you're claiming. Instead of dealing with them, you only resort to the "this-looks-suspicious" rhetoric that is typical of conspiracy theorists.
How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023
Wow! This is a well-articulated write-up with prac[…]
The trouble with astrology is that constel[…]