Greta wrote: ↑September 11th, 2019, 9:07 am
GaryLouisSmith wrote: ↑September 10th, 2019, 10:55 pm
You dodged the question.
Actually, I answered it, but not in the black & white way that would allow you to put me in one of those little boxes you reserve for those who think unlike you. Like us, the ancients couldn't help noticing what was happening around them. Then they aimed to pass on their findings to the next generations.
So, no, superstitious ancients were not idiots, just accessing different bodies of knowledge. Having said that, their doctors were even worse than ours today and I'm not sure I'd fancy undergoing an exorcism to cure me of bacterial illness.
I wasn't talking about the ancients, but about 'primitive' people. I put that word is quotes. Most of the people alive today are 'primitive', not only in the third world, but also in the first world. That is to say they believe in those gods and spirits that roam, not only the woods, but also the back alleys of cities and the white walls of wall street. For the most part human beings are religious of one form or another. They dream wild dreams. And the have vicious arguments about it all. It is that sectarian, argumentative nature of humankind that is their true nature, the spiritual in them. Other animals are territorial only. Humans are that, but we love dialectics. We argue. My dislike of so many naturalists is that they will not argue, but feign harmonious friendship with all creatures. Even other humans. But when it comes to other humans it is fake. I like to see human beings disagree and call out other humans. Today the 'scientific' argue with the 'primitive' and that is ok. I just hate it when the 'scientific' treat the 'primitive' like children.