Felix wrote: ↑August 18th, 2018, 3:52 pm I don't see how James Randi is relevant to a conversation about healing practitioners, unless they claim they can raise the dead or something. Could he tell you if someone is a genuine acupuncturist or psychologist?The challenge would vary depending on the specific claim of the individual. He has debunked so called mediums, astrologers, people who claim to have telepathy, telekinesis, fortune tellers and so forth.
Yet still, not one person ever rose to the occasion to prove the rational mind of the sceptics wrong. Why do you think that is?Don't know what Randi's stipulations are, what sort of claims he will or won't examine. In the case of intuition, it doesn't seem to be something that one can call up at will, so it's not surprising that those who claim they can do so are found to be frauds.
Intuition is not a supernatural ability, there are completely valid explanations which demonstrate how intuition functions. All humans have a instinct driven intuitive aspect to there nature so of course there is no need to investigate it.
Actpuncture is a silly mystic airy fairy practice which utilises two pyscological aspects of the human mind to get a less than average success rate.
First is the placebo effect, the pyscological misdirection of the mind and second is the nature of the situation. When people go to actupuncture clinics they are taking a break from there everyday routine to lay down in quiet, relaxed environment with slow music, dimmed lighting or candles maybe some form of incense whilst in the presence of a practitioner who touching the body (soft skin to skin) while talking and listening to there patient. In other words it is the environment which the patient is absorbed in which de stresses the mind and lowers the heart rate (healthy mind) not the actual needles in the body which were traditionally used to even out the energy flow through the body which the chineese believed caused disease.