Juice wrote:I only encourage examination of the various evolution theories and examinations of all sides of the observations and conclusions/theories for oneself.If you are not comfortable discussing the reasoning behind a topic, then you are not involved in "examinations of all sides of" that topic. In fact, it would seem that you aren't really examining that topic at all; if you're unwilling to approach the topic reasonably, then all you're doing is making an emotional judgment about it.
Alun-I am not to comfortable with the reasoning behind self flagellation.
The hoaxes you cite are exceptions that prove the rule. The point of science is not to perpetrate fraud, just to devise principles to explain empirical evidence. Certainly, people don't always pursue this purpose--but if the majority of scientists were involved in illegitimate activities, we both wouldn't have legitimate results (successful predictions, working tools, etc.) and we wouldn't care that some people were lying about their results.
What exactly is it that you're arguing, Juice? That people shouldn't trust scientists just because they're scientists? OK. What does that basic logical stance have to do with anything? No advocate of evolution by natural selection says, "Just trust the scientists." What is being said is, "Just trust the substantial evidence that has been gathered by scientists--unless you've got some that really contradicts the theory."