Xris wrote:Interesting must look it up.
Here is link to Russell graphics. I dont find the specifi graphic I recall seeing, that, shows a flow going from both particles at same time, in opposite directions of course. One of Gaedes graphics shows that.
http://www.philosophy.org/scientific.html
http://ccosmology.blogspot.com/2014/02/ ... shift.html
~~~(~)~~~~(~)~~~...Gaedes Rope Hypothesis..see link above as conscious EMR agent
Gaedes gravity is resultant of EMRadiation tension...as I understand or misunderstand it.
(^v)(^v)(^v)(^v)(^v)(^v)...r6's tangent vectoral tori..very similar
(-
><-
)(-
><-
)(-
><-
)(-><-)...another way of expressing r6's concept....as consciousness agent.
To be clear with my r6 stuff, those geodesic arcs invert/invaginate >< at their peak-- of an abstract great circle --on outer positive surface {
gravity },
and inner negative surface {
dark energy } of the vectorial tori.
The outer positive surface peaks (> are where the tori are tangent to each other. I must say, that, I like Gaedes concepts very much, as they are so much like my own.
However, the way I came to my incomplete scenarios, is via my explorations of prime number patterns, as expressed with quasi-linear, four level/line pattern, where all prime numbers--- except 2 and 3 ---fall on the 2nd line from top. I then transferred this to a 2D hexagon discovered all prime numbers, except 2 and 3 fall on two radii, seperate from each by a non-prime number radii.
To my surprise, I received a letter from Oxford University, mathematician Ian Stewart. He stated that he have never seen my geometric expressions for prime numbers before, and then explained to me how the algebra for my geometric expressions were discovered 200 years ago. 6 * n plus or minus 1 is where all prime numbers--- except 2 and 3 ---will fall.
I then say how my hexagon shows that every 6th radii, plus or minus on radii is where all the primes fall. I flunked out of math in 9th grade so I really a mathematical moron for most part. I just happen to stumble upon Bucky Fullers stuff and then had a new geometric way to be inspired.
So then 10 years later, I turned my quasi-1D wave inside-out. So now the prime number line was the top line and since Fuller makes clear that any real line does not go onward infinity, I saw how the top and bottom line close around to become the abstract outer and inner great circle of a tori.
It then became obvious the two inside lines defined a sine-wave topology, where before, the whole four lines defined the topology of regular sine-wave, now only the inside two lines defined a regular/symmetrical topological sine-wave.
0.......6.......12.......18........24.......30......36... observed
time
....3.......9........15.......21........27......33.........observed
time
I then saw that the sine-wave is defined by the inversion/invagination of the outer > and < inner trajectories. My texticons above give this idea but cannot show the actual break in the trajectory. A trajectory, that approximates, an abstract outer and inner great circle.
In this sense, particles pop in out of existence from
gravity and dark energy. This was difficult for me to accept at first. I don't claim to have any of the answers to wave-particle, or entanglement mysteries, as I would have to have better modeling and mathematical abilities to better understand my scenario, as stated.
r6
- By Fried Egg
- By Sanju Lali
- By Thrylix
- By Pattern-chaser