Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate

[Subatomic God]

My brain is not for math; my brain is for what makes sense of the math. Considering that the Riemann's hypothesis dealt with numbers which created an infinite sequence, which was then was curious towards why the numbers contained half values; the reason behind it was posited to be the the imaginary units within a real value, which resonates in my brain as I am aware that 2+2=5 based on Einstein's theory and that the entire Universe is based on the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio, which is to say that knowing that math is based on the entire Universe, having knowledge of how the Universe seems to be "skipping" numbers, is enough information to suppose that the Riemann's hypothesis is truly relational to how the Universe creates both, genuine matter and imaginary matter, hence why the human mind can create both real things and false things - math is based on the human mind, which is why our emotions are based on Newton's Law. I may not be able to read the thousands of names and labels they gave this formula - I am able to tell what this formula is relating to by its pinnacle of interest. Therefore the Riemann's hypothesis is directing us towards a truth that explains why the Universe manages to create false units and true units within the space and matter which are based on the previously aforementioned designs. If anyone wants to solve this mystery, I suggest them to combine the knowledge of everything I mentioned, as this formula reflects on Einstein's theory, the behavior of the imagination and the reality we live in, the Golden Ratio, the Fibonacci Sequence and possibly other things I have yet to read on.

In other words, my brain discovered that Riemann''s hypothesis can explain why humans live in both, imagination and reality, while it also can explain Einstein's theory, as for my consensus the imaginary units equal the imagination; the real value points equal the reality, while for Einstein's theory, it's because the only reason why 2+2=5, is because the Universe operates on more than one-point integer level, but a series of decimals, fractions and imaginary numbers. Also, keep in mind that 2, 5 is part of the Fibonacci Sequence.

[Philosophy Explorer]

SG said, in part:

"...as I am aware that 2+2=5 based on Einstein's theory and that the entire Universe is based on the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio."

Einstein wasn't a mathematician, let alone that he said that 2 + 2 = 5. Also you wouldn't be the first to say that the universe is based on or derived from math (btw Riemann's hypothesis is about the conjecture of the distribution of the prime numbers).

The entire universe isn't based on the interrelated Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Ratio. However portions of it is.

PhilX

-- Updated August 11th, 2014, 1:00 am to add the following --

SG said, in part:

"...as I am aware that 2+2=5 based on Einstein's theory and that the entire Universe is based on the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio."

Einstein wasn't a mathematician, let alone that he said that 2 + 2 = 5. Also you wouldn't be the first to say that the universe is based on or derived from math (btw Riemann's hypothesis is about the conjecture of the distribution of the prime numbers).

The entire universe isn't based on the interrelated Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Ratio. However portions of it is.

PhilX

[Obvious Leo]

Albert was only a journeyman mathematician who let others do his sums for him but he managed to get through first grade. He was something of a rebel in the world of physics but he wasn't willing to stick his neck out on this one. He wisely chose to go with the majority and agreed that 2+2 =4.

Regards Leo

-- Updated August 11th, 2014, 6:48 pm to add the following --

Dear god,

I would prefer not to speculate what your brain has done to the Riemann hypothesis but I’m rather alarmed about what the Riemann hypothesis has done to your brain. Number theory is not for the faint-hearted and your courage is to be admired although it is generally considered unwise to invent your own, for obvious health reasons.

I’m not mathematician myself but I have a deep interest in mathematical philosophy and my problems with the Riemann hypothesis are many and varied. Perhaps you could clear up a few nagging questions about it which have plagued me for many years.

Q1. Has the Lindelhof hypothesis on the growth of the zeta function on the critical line been weakened by Titchmarsh’s work on the sharp bounds, the implication being that its inverse would grow by a factor of 2.?

Q2. Can the Selberg zeta functions be co-related with the Ihara zeta functions into Montgomery’s pair correlation structures or do you prefer that they should be included within the Dirichlet L-series, or some other number field.?

Q3. Many attempts have been made to prove the Riemann hypothesis and yet no clear method seems apparent. Did you use the Hilbert spaces of entire functions or was your preferred line of approach one via non-commutative geometry.?

Q4. Perhaps the biggest unresolved question from Bernhard Riemann’s life’s work still remains the question of the zeros on the critical line, both their location and their number. Many scholars have had a crack at this and the Hadamard/de la Vallee Poussin theorem has mostly been favoured. However both the Hardy/Littlewood conjectures and the Selberg conjectures point to some irreconcilable difficulties with the gram points. How do you resolve these?

Once you clear these small matters up I’ll have some questions for you on the Fibonacci sequence.

Thanking you in anticipation

Leo

[Subatomic God]

Einstein wasn't a mathematician, let alone that he said that 2 + 2 = 5. Also you wouldn't be the first to say that the universe is based on or derived from math (btw Riemann's hypothesis is about the conjecture of the distribution of the prime numbers).

The entire universe isn't based on the interrelated Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Ratio. However portions of it is.

Einstein believed 2 + 2 = 5. I am most certainly aware that I am not the first to consider math encompasses the Universe; I am the first to consider how to use math (such as Riemann's hypothesis) to explain the relationship of human behavior, as per the reality and imaginary consensus.

Einstein could not discover the things he did, without using a genius level of math. Of course he wasn't a mathematician; he was beyond it.

An interesting thing to consider, is why you say only portions of it is, when those portions are the result of everything in the Universe creating a nearly perfect design based on self-similarity. It's like saying the design means nothing on a grand level because it's only in some places, even though the entire Universe worked that design - what did you expect? Spirals and triangles everywhere? Then what then would a spiral and triangle be, if it's all crowding each other? What about planets? They aren't "everywhere", but the reason why is exactly why spirals and triangles are not "everywhere". Need I remind you that the design, itself between the Golden Ratio and the Fibonacci Sequence are that of a ripple effect; things near the center are closer together than those away from the center, which creates an ever-increasing effect so forth. It's not "everywhere", because that's what makes it "space".

-- Updated August 11th, 2014, 12:40 pm to add the following --

Q3. Many attempts have been made to prove the Riemann hypothesis and yet no clear method seems apparent.

I do not understand the petty labels and symbols that were used to explain space phenomenon, however I have the Universe in my hand, so I am able to apply the nature and behavior of this formula to other likened cases as to anchor down the formula in a way that my brain can manage it without butchering it, which lead me to the powerful consensus that Riemann's hypothesis can explain the nature of the human mind's ability to create real matter and unreal matter; and can be connected to 2+2=5, the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio.

I cannot solve it, as I do not have the tools; that's not to say I don't have the answer on how to solve it. Look deeply into these suggestions as well as others I may be missing, and you'll see that there is a reason why this formula is a mystery, why 2+2=5 is a mystery, why the imagination and consciousness is a mystery, then you'll see why imaginary numbers / imaginary number and this formula co-exist for a damn good reason.

[Philosophy Explorer]

While it's true that Einstein was a genius, it was in physics he was a genius, not math. In fact he had to work with a mathematician in some of his work.

Can you cite internet sources claiming that Einstein believed 2 + 2 = 5? Also do you have any sources saying that the universe is based on Fibonacci numbers/golden mean?

PhilX

[Subatomic God]

While it's true that Einstein was a genius, it was in physics he was a genius, not math. In fact he had to work with a mathematician in some of his work.

Can you cite internet sources claiming that Einstein believed 2 + 2 = 5? Also do you have any sources saying that the universe is based on Fibonacci numbers/golden mean?

PhilX

I'm not a source type of person, as sources prevent real genius - sources are for average ideas, not grand ideas. It's like taking old seeds and trying to grow new trees - or trying to put seeds where they can't grow. These ideas I have are not to be answered, but further questioned as long as it takes until it is contradicted or makes a breakthrough. There's no such thing as "needs evidence", "just poetry", so on for these ideas I have. As I like to tell people: "You cannot work with genius - you make genius."

Einstein is like me, he had the brain to make connections in even things we weren't personally good at.

If anything, Newton and Einstein are involved with the 2 + 2 = 5; while the Fibonacci Sequence and Golden Ratio are based on how the moon/earth are positioned as well as every spiral-shaped galaxy. Galaxies created life, therefore Fibonacci Sequence created life - the Fibonacci Sequence is in everything throughout nature, like math, therefore it's in "everything", in spite of it not being "everywhere". Same goes for the Golden Ratio; without it, we would not have this mathematically positioned solar system. Something I realized though, is, the planets are positioned in a wave-like effect, that is to say that the solar system we're in was created by a ripple effect like: o--o----o--------o--------------o - so on.

[Philosophy Explorer]

I believe in sources.

PhilX

[Subatomic God]

I believe in sources.

PhilX

That did not stop geniuses from knowing what they are talking about because sources are like degrees - it doesn't matter whether you have it or not, it's all in you- if people can't see it, that's their problem. Most degrees and sources aren't even treated with responsibility because anyone can make up the ranks while full of themselves and get their nonsense peer-reviewed.

All the things I say that make you think is enough to realize I have knowledge beyond your own. Respect that and you will be rewarded - disrespect that and you will be distorted.

[Obvious Leo]

I have the Universe in my hand,

Have another look at your hand, mate. I think you've grabbed hold of the wrong member.

[Subatomic God]

Have another look at your hand, mate. I think you've grabbed hold of the wrong member.

I know all: The Subconscious, Conscious, Psychopathy, Humanity, Ego, Pride, Passion, Integrity, Intuition, Fear, Hunger, Anger, Insanity, Color, Personality, Vibration, Existence, Faculty, Depression, Curiosity, Thrive, Dream, Emotion, Reaction, Identity, Distinction, Paradigm, Projection, Interaction, Confusion, Holism and Nihilism.

I know the ties between the following:

Bees / Electrons

Black holes / Birth

Asteroids / Kidney stones

Stars / Seeds

Volcanoes / Penises

Soil / Vaginas

Emotion / Electromagnetic waves

Consciousness / Water

Amoeba / Life

Human design / Sea life design

Human behavior / Universe behavior

Eyes / Galaxies

Sex / Creation

Anger / Destruction

Ignorance / Dark matter

Light / Awareness

Gravity / Greed

Sun / Male

Moon / Female

Ocean / Conscious and Subconscious

Sky / Realm of Ideologies

Clouds / Ideas

Stages of human life: Animosity > Humanity > Insanity > Self-humility

Stages of the human brain in frequencies: Gamma, Beta, Alpha, Theta and Delta.

Stages of human personality: red (survival), orange (taking a stand), yellow (taking control), green (love), light blue (communication), dark blue (intuition) and purple (forming a bond between ourselves and the Universe).

I'm quite positive the Universe is in my hands, as I have a sound process elimination system.